Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied and Basics Subjects

ISSN: 2583-052X

Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied and Basics Subjects
Home Archive Volume 5 - Issue 4 Turning HS Non-Decoders to Basic Decoders Through Sound City’s Exploring Sounds in Words: A Basis in Crafting an Intervention Plan for Reading

Volume 5   Issue 4

Research Article

Turning HS Non-Decoders to Basic Decoders Through Sound City’s Exploring Sounds in Words: A Basis in Crafting an Intervention Plan for Reading

Article Identifier: https://identifier.visnav.in/1.0002/ijabs-25e-17005/
Philippines
Abstract

This research investigated the efficacy of Sound City’s Exploring Sounds in Words, a systematic phonics program, in changing high school non-decoders into minimal decoders. The study employed a one-group pretest-posttest design and had ten Grade 7 students from two public high schools in Nueva Ecija as participants who were labeled as non-decoders based on the Philippine Informal Reading Inventory (Phil-IRI). Participants received a four-week intervention through the use of Sound City Reading materials, and they were assessed before and after intervention on alphabet knowledge, letter-sound relation, and simple word form decoding. The findings indicated minimal change in written letter-sound identification but statistically significant improvements in oral reading proficiency in letter sounds, letter pairs, and simple sight words. Socio-demographic information showed that low parental literacy and inadequate home reading support explained the reading struggles of the participants. The research concluded that Sound City Reading is a good tool for improving decoding skills in older struggling readers and suggested its wider application as a formal intervention strategy in primary education. The results underscore the necessity of phonics-based teaching, enhanced teacher training, and increased parental engagement to tackle entrenched learning gaps in literacy.

Keywords: decoding, phonics, reading intervention, non-decoders, Sound City Reading, literacy, secondary education, phonological awareness
Download
References:
  1. Bustos-Orosa M., & Ferrer, M. (2013). A qualitative analysis of the decoding error patterns among Filipino beginning readers transitioning to the Marungko approach. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, Volume 2 Number 4, 41-52.
  2. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin.
  3. Chen, Q., Kong, Y., Gao, W., & Mo, L. (2018). Effects of Socioeconomic Status, Parent–Child Relationship, and Learning Motivation on Reading Ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.
  4. EFA FTI Secretariat. (2011). Teaching reading in the early grades: A teacher's handbook. Education for All—Fast Track Initiative. Retrieved from EFA Global Partnership for Education
  5. Foorman, B. R., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (2016). Decoding and the role of phonological awareness in beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 31–37.
  6. Hemmerechts, K., Ağırdağ, O., & Kavadias, D. (2016). The relationship between parental literacy involvement, socio-economic status and reading literacy. Educational Review, 69(1), 85.
  7. Isha, S. R., & Mamat, N. (2019). Comparing the Relationship Between Parenting Styles of High Education Level of Parents with the Level of Emotional Intelligence of Preschool Children. 12.
  8. Khan, T. J., Shaik-Abdullah, S., & Sani, A. M. (2023). The Impact of English Teachers on ESL Pre-University Students’ L2 Reading Motivation in Pakistan. Journal of Advances in Humanities Research, 2(3), 53.
  9. Kloosterman, R., Notten, N., Tolsma, J., & Kraaykamp, G. (2010). The Effects of Parental Reading Socialization and Early School Involvement on Children’s Academic Performance: A Panel Study of Primary School Pupils in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 27(3), 291.
  10. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  11. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016). PISA 2015 results: Excellence and equity in education (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from OECD iLibrary
  12. Rowe, K. J., & Rowe, K. S. (1992). The Relationship between Inattentiveness in the Classroom and Reading Achievement (Part B): An Explanatory Study. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(2), 357.
  13. Sage Journals. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.
  14. Sambayon, J. T., Luceñara, D. P., Luceñara, C. P., Bayron, Q. M., Peñaloga, R. A., & Larombe, E. A. (2023). Effectiveness of Contextualized Learning Materials in Improving the Reading Skills and Comprehension Level of the Students.
  15. Seidenberg, M. S. (2017). Language at the speed of sight: How we read, why so many can’t, and what can be done about it. Basic Books.
  16. Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). The development of phonemic skills and reading fluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 256–261.
  17. Tomas, M., Villaros, E., & Galman, S. (2021). The Perceived Challenges in Reading of Learners: Basis for School Reading Programs. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 9, 107-122.
  18. World Bank. (2024). Literacy and learning poverty: Tackling the global reading crisis. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from World Bank
  19. World Literacy Foundation. (2015). The economic and social cost of illiteracy: A snapshot of illiteracy in a global context. Retrieved from World Literacy Foundation.